Skip to content

Frequency Foundation

Twice the Energy with Half the Stress

Cancer Undefeated

Review of John Bailar’s expert critique of the war on cancer.

Dr. Bailar was my thesis advisor and co-author at the University of Colorado School of Medicine. He served as the lead statistician for the New England Journal of Medicine for a decade or more and was the Chairman of the Department of Public Health at the University of Chicago prior to his passing in 2016.

ABSTRACT

Background: Despite decades of basic and clinical research and trials of promising new therapies, cancer remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. We assessed overall progress against cancer in the United States from 1970 through 1994 by analyzing changes in age-adjusted mortality rates.

Methods: We obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics data on all deaths from cancer and from cancer at specific sites, as well as on deaths due to cancer according to age, race, and sex, for the years 1970 through 1994. We computed age-specific mortality rates and adjusted them to the age distribution of the U.S. population in 1990.

Results: Age-adjusted mortality due to cancer in 1994 (200.9 per 100,000 population) was 6.0 percent higher than the rate in 1970 (189.6 per 100,000). After decades of steady increases, the age-adjusted mortality due to all malignant neoplasms plateaued, then decreased by 1.0 percent from 1991 to 1994. The decline in mortality due to cancer was greatest among black males and among persons under 55 years of age. Mortality among white males 55 or older has also declined recently. These trends reflect a combination of changes in death rates from specific types of cancer, with important declines due to reduced cigarette smoking and improved screening and a mixture of increases and decreases in the incidence of types of cancer not closely related to tobacco use.

Conclusions: The war against cancer is far from over. Observed changes in mortality due to cancer primarily reflect changing incidence or early detection. The effect of new treatments for cancer on mortality has been largely disappointing. The most promising approach to the control of cancer is a national commitment to prevention, with a concomitant rebalancing of the focus and funding of research.

SARS Update: Virus Persistence and Route of Infection

In a 5/11 posting I described exposure to the SARS virus from a coughing passenger in front of me on an airline flight from Atlanta to San Antonio. My testing indicated the virus was all over the front of my shirt, my face, and eye glasses. Simply washing of the hands, face, and eye glasses with soap removed it. The shirt I saved in a sealed plastic container in my suitcase. A week later the virus was still virilent in my bag.

Using the 33566hz frequency, I disinfected the shirt before removing it from the sealed container, then threw it into the washing machine. This experiment indicates that the virus is persistent for long periods of time on clothing.

On a further note, the virus infected my upper respiratory tract and was initially located primarily there. I began to feel chest pain in my lower lungs before I eliminated it. The Scientist commented on this in an article yesterday. I was unable to check specifically on the blood while traveling to see if it worked its way down through the lungs or passed through the bloodstream into the lower lung.

SARS unanswered questions

New York meeting explores remaining mysteries and clues about the new virus

By Catherine Zandonella, 19 May 2003, The Scientist

Scientists are still unsure how the virus gets deep into the lungs, where it causes alveolar damage that can be fatal. Most cold and flu viruses lodge in the upper respiratory tract, including the nose, sinuses, and throat. The SARS virus may lodge there and then work its way down, or it may diffuse into the bloodstream and reemerge in the lungs. If the latter is true, then blood levels of virus, or titer, could be very important in charting the course of the disease.

Drug Wars: Payback Time

Trial Lawyers Now Take Aim at Drug Makers

By Alex Berenson, New York Times, Sunday, 18 May 2003

Enriched and emboldened after successful fights against asbestos and tobacco companies, some of the nation’s top plaintiffs’ lawyers have trained their sights on drug makers, claiming that many giant pharmaceutical companies have hidden the dangers of medicines the lawyers say have harmed thousands of people.

In some cases the drugs at issue have already been pulled off the market, like Rezulin, a diabetes treatment from Pfizer that the Food and Drug Administration has linked to liver damage and is the target of almost 9,000 suits. Other suits name some of the industry’s current best sellers, including Paxil, an antidepressant that plaintiffs contend is addictive — a claim denied by the drug’s maker, GlaxoSmithKline.

In some instances, teams of plaintiffs’ lawyers are spending several million dollars preparing cases for trial, in the hopes of winning billions of dollars in settlements and jury verdicts from the drug companies, which have some of the deepest pockets among American corporations.

SARS Update: Coronavirus Strikes Again on Airline Flight



Today I flew from Boston to San Antonio for a healthcare conference. I got lucky and was upgraded to first class. On the Atlanta to San Antonio leg, a guy in front of me had a cough. I noticed it but was not too worried about it because it was not a constant dry hacking cough. By the time I picked up my bag, I had chest pain that I recognized from a previous corona virus infection.

My FSCAN was in my luggage, so I got to the hotel as quickly as possible to do a DIRP scan to see if I could get a nice chart of the virus. My Cameron Aurameter was telling me it was definitely 33566 (coronavirus) and 255616 (metapneumovirus). By the time the shuttle was approaching downtown San Antonio, the chest pain was gone indicating I had some immunity to this virus from a previous infection.

On getting to the hotel room, a DIRP scan did not show good resonance. However my Cameron Auromater showed that treating at the frequencies above was effective and I had definite physical symptoms indicating the virus was present and treatment was working.

I had plenty of time to test for the bandwidth of the corona virus. For this infection it was 11HZ meaning treatment was necessary from 33555 to 33577. Treating an increments of 1 HZ caused all symptoms to disappear but the Aurameter indicated the virus was persistent.

Testing indicated the virus was on my face, my glasses, and the front of my shirt, just what you would expect from where I was sitting. I’m leaving my shirt out to see how long the virus will persist undisturbed on clothing.

The bandwidth of the metapneumovirus is 1HZ and that was knocked out by a few minutes of treatment with the FSCAN. The corona virus persisted (although all symptoms were gone) so repeated treatment is necessary. In this instance, Oscillicoccinum stopped replication of the remaining virus after treating for 10 minutes with the FSCAN. My immune system and further frequency treatment will be needed to deal with the remaining virus.

Oscillicoccinum tests positive for treating the corona virus in the early phases. You should not be without this homeopathic remedy which is available in any healthfood store. This in combination with Transfer Factor Plus to pump up your immune system may save your life. Many people have asked me how to get Transfer Factor and the best way is to call Dale Fawcett in Seattle at (360) 598-6585 and tell him I sent you. Everyone has access to these remedies, even if they do not have an FSCAN, and I believe they are sufficient to easily deal with a light SARS infection that you might pick up on an airplane, as long as you treat yourself at first signs of infection.

This experience confirms several things for me:

1. The corona virus can be transmitted through the air without the assistance of a parasite to carry it. Previous infections in multiple people were associated with a microscopic parasite.

2. The metapneumovirus has been with it in every case now, but is easily knocked out in a few minutes with the FSCAN. The coronavirus is the real culprit and treatment must be repeated for an extended period of time.

3. The corona virus has a rather wide bandwidth which is typical of a persistent infection which is difficult to treat and resistant to drugs. Oscillicoccinum combined with extended frequency treatment is the best way to treat this disease.

4. Be prepared. This disease is definitely coming to your neighborhood. It is already widely dispersed. The good news is that many people do not get seriously ill. The bad news is that they go undiagnosed and infect others.

Dr. Ames and Metabolic Tuneup

Bruce Ames was one of the leading researchers in carcinogenesis 23 years ago when I completed by Ph.D. thesis on carcinogenesis at the University of Colorado School of Medicine. So people take note when he says something, Recently, he has cofounded a company selling Juvenon, a combination of acetyl carnitine and lipoic acid. Those of us with some knowledge in the area listen to what Bruce says. I’ve tested Juvenon and my system needs it regularly.

The Metabolic Tune-Up: Metabolic Harmony and Disease Prevention

Supplement: 11th International Symposium on Trace Elements in Man and Animals

J. Nutr. 133:1544S-1548S, May 2003

Bruce N. Ames E-mail: [email protected]

An optimum intake of micronutrients and metabolites, which varies with age and genetic constitution, would tune up metabolism and give a marked increase in health, particularly for the poor and elderly, at little cost. 1) DNA damage. Inadequate intake of folic acid causes millions of uracils to be incorporated into the DNA of each cell with associated chromosome breaks, essentially producing a radiation mimic. Deficiencies of the metabolically connected vitamins B-6 and B-12, which are also widespread, also cause uracil incorporation and chromosome breaks. Inadequate iron intake (2 billion women in the world; 25% of U.S. menstruating women) causes oxidants to leak from mitochondria and damages mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA. Inadequate zinc intake (10% in the U.S.) causes oxidation and DNA damage in human cells. 2) The Km concept. Approximately 50 different human genetic diseases that are due to a poorer binding affinity (Km) of the mutant enzyme for its coenzyme can be remedied by feeding high-dose B vitamins, which raise levels of the corresponding coenzyme. Many polymorphisms also result in a lowered affinity of enzyme for coenzyme. 3) Mitochondrial oxidative decay with age. This decay, which is a major contributor to aging, can be ameliorated by feeding old rats the normal mitochondrial metabolites acetyl carnitine and lipoic acid at high levels. They restore the Km for acetyl carnitine transferase and the velocity of the reaction as well as mitochondrial function; reduce levels of oxidants, neuron RNA oxidation and mutagenic aldehydes; and increase old-rat ambulatory activity and cognition.

Pollen is high is zip code 02144



I have not detected any significant pollen lately in Somerville, MA, probably due to recent rains. This morning, on my daily run, I picked up what I believe to be a tree pollen with frequency 498573. This frequency will clear out any symptoms. Delisos Northeast Allergy Mix is also very helpful. By evening two new frequencies were prevalent – 497787 465822.



It’s pollen season again and two of the worst cities in the U.S. today are Hartford and Providence. I’m a little further north in the Boston area with a high count today in zip code 02144. Since I am about to practice for a 5K run, I tested on my deck and found only one offending pollen with frequency 484857. Using my FSCAN I entered the frequency with a wobble of 7 around the primary frequency. After putting the FSCAN leads under the input well of my BioPhoton Integrator to broadcast the frequency to me while running, I headed out the door. My heart rate was a little higher than normal for the first 10 minutes of the run, then stabilizes. When I returned, there was not a trace of active pollen in my system. The frequencies had killed the pollens as they entered my system.

This is yet another example that shows pollen allergies are the result of pollen organisms growing in the body. Your body provides an excellent immune response to try to kill the pollen organisms. Unfortunately, the immune response is ineffective in people with chronic allergies. The FSCAN takes the place of your immune system and makes short work of the pollens. If you are allergic to just about all pollens like I am, this is a true miracle of modern technology. Unfortunately, to conventional medicine, this is viewed as science fiction. Since I’d rather be healed than be believed, I fired my Harvard trained allergist 10 years ago and radically improved my health as a result. Caveat: This is not a recommendation to fire your allergist. You must be able to do a better job of healing yourself than your allergist and prove it conclusively before you adopt a new strategy. If you can’t demonstrate your healing capability to your allergist via lab tests, stick with conventional medicine.

Yet Another Reason Not to Take Prozac

Scientists find Prozac ‘link’ to brain tumours

By Steve Connor Science Editor

26 March 2002

Scientists have discovered that Prozac, the antidepressant taken by millions of people around the world, may stimulate the growth of brain tumours by blocking the body’s natural ability to kill cancer cells.

Medical Error: 25% of the time, the drug your physician prescribes for you will harm you

I’ve always recommended that no drugs be taken without the patient personally reading the Physicians Desk Reference and understanding side effects and contraindications. The New England Journal of Medicine just published an article on outpatient medication errors which appear to be four times more prevalent than inpatient medication errors. Since we kill over 100,000 people a year with inpatient medications, the deaths due to outpatient medications could be much larger, although none of the serious adverse events in this study were fatal or life threatening.



Adverse Drug Events in Ambulatory Care

Tejal K. Gandhi, M.D., M.P.H., Saul N. Weingart, M.D., Ph.D., Joshua Borus, B.A., Andrew C. Seger, R.Ph., Josh Peterson, M.D., Elisabeth Burdick, M.S., Diane L. Seger, R.Ph., Kirstin Shu, B.A., Frank Federico, R.Ph., Lucian L. Leape, M.D., and David W. Bates, M.D.

ABSTRACT

Background: Adverse events related to drugs occur frequently among inpatients, and many of these events are preventable. However, few data are available on adverse drug events among outpatients. We conducted a study to determine the rates, types, severity, and preventability of such events among outpatients and to identify preventive strategies.

Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study, including a survey of patients and a chart review, at four adult primary care practices in Boston (two hospital-based and two community-based), involving a total of 1202 outpatients who received at least one prescription during a four-week period. Prescriptions were computerized at two of the practices and handwritten at the other two.

Results: Of the 661 patients who responded to the survey (response rate, 55 percent), 162 had adverse drug events (25 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 20 to 29 percent), with a total of 181 events (27 per 100 patients). Twenty-four of the events (13 percent) were serious, 51 (28 percent) were ameliorable, and 20 (11 percent) were preventable. Of the 51 ameliorable events, 32 (63 percent) were attributed to the physician’s failure to respond to medication-related symptoms and 19 (37 percent) to the patient’s failure to inform the physician of the symptoms.

The medication classes most frequently involved in adverse drug events were selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (10 percent), beta-blockers (9 percent), angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors (8 percent), and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents (8 percent). On multivariate analysis, only the number of medications taken was significantly associated with adverse events.

Conclusions: Adverse events related to drugs are common in primary care, and many are preventable or ameliorable. Monitoring for and acting on symptoms are important. Improving communication between outpatients and providers may help prevent adverse events related to drugs.

SARS Update: What Works – Latest Update

After treating two volunteers for a week, I identified the last remaining fragments of the offending organisms. As soon as these were treated, all trace of SARS was eliminated. Daily treatments for 10 days are recommended. Testing and retreating every fews days to a week thereafter is recommended. This is a persistent infection and some of it will hang around for a while, even without any clinical symptoms.

SARS appears to be an an infection by three organisms, a parasite, a corona virus, and a metapneumovirus. The parasite appears to be the transmitting agent carrying the two viruses. It also appears that if the parasite infection grows rapidly in an individual, it (1) makes them more infective than others, and/or (2) depresses their immune system allowing the viruses to proliferate more rapidly causing higher risk of death.

This could be the reason that only those over 40 are at higher risk of death and that death occurs primarily in healthy people over 40. People are more susceptible to parasite infections as they age and even if you are healthy, this parasite can suppress your immune system and allow rapid proliferation of the viruses. Both the parasite and viruses are nasty and can cause pain where there is an infection. This seems to occur primarily in the lung, sinuses, and lymph nodes. However, the parasite gets into the blood stream and can travel anywhere in the body.

Oscillicoccinum 200C will help control proliferation of the viruses in the early stages. I’ve always argued that this homeopathic remedy would prevent most flu deaths and I believe it could prevent most SARS deaths.

The F100 program I am using successfully to deal with several cases, including animals who can be infected by the parasite transmitted from people, is:

label start

dwell 14

duty 10

converge 7 1

pulse 64 75

#########

9563 6157 5513 3735 1559 #SARS parasite frequencies

33566 255616 #SARS corona virus and metapneumovirus

1556 2286 5763 8015 #SARS viral fragments

162 563 5613 5235 #SARS remaining fragments

#########

goto start

I run this cycle until I no longer get a positive reading for any of the frequencies and all symptoms are gone. It needs to be repeated daily for 10 days.

The acid test is whether this is repeatable by others. Two individuals have already had significant success. Let me know if you find these frequencies useful.